EMPLOYERS SCEPTICAL OF ‘SUPERFICIAL’ GOVERNMENT PLANS TO TACKLE GENDER PAY, FINDS GW4 RESEARCH COMMUNITYDecember 22, 2016
New regulations requiring companies to report pay gaps between men and women are potentially “superficial” and will not necessarily tackle the complex reasons why females still have lower salaries, new research shows.
Employers told researchers from the University of Exeter, University of Bath and Cardiff University that the Government’s proposals would over-simplify issues, just advertise pay rates without giving context and may not benefit all female staff.
The study has been undertaken as part of a research collaboration facilitated by the GW4 Alliance, which brings together four of the most research-intensive and innovative universities in the UK; the universities of Bath, Bristol, Cardiff and Exeter.
Companies with 250 or more employees will soon be required to give overall statistics about levels of pay for each gender. The experts have said real change could come about if employers were required to present this data in a more expansive way, accompanied by a reflective report explaining gender pay gaps alongside an action plan of how they intend to close them.
Professor Carol Woodhams, from the University of Exeter Business School, said: “Our research shows companies are concerned about the complexity of the data that will be required. It could also be presented in a superficial way which would over-simplify a complex issue benefitting neither their female staff nor themselves.”
The experts interviewed employers, and ran an online survey which was completed by 150 HR managers across all industries. They spoke to HR managers in 20 organisations of different sizes within the public, private and third sectors.
Interviews revealed that employers thought the legislation would have limited impact because there was no penalty, although this is being considered by the government, and the latest guidance suggests that this is being tightened up.
Employers also told researchers that they were concerned they would not be given the time to understand or prepare for the change. They were also worried about how the gaps would be explained and qualified, how the figures were going to be compiled and whether it would be a fair and true reflection of the position. There have also been difficulties in defining what pay includes.
One interviewee, from a private sector manufacturing company said: “I think that lack of clarity at the moment is how we will report it and I think there are some high level discussions that need to be had to make sure that we are aligned on what we’re reporting, what information we’re putting out there because obviously as soon as we put it on our intranet then it’s available to anybody internally and I guess externally as well. We’ve got some legal advisors and they run a seminar around gender pay reporting and actually we went through and discussed a narrative that would go alongside that reporting to explain why is it that our results are what they are.”
Professor Nick Talbot, Chair of the Board for the GW4 Alliance and Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research and Impact) at University of Exeter, said: “These important findings on the UK Government’s approach to gender pay gap reporting are a testament to the innovative and collaborative nature of the GW4 Pay Equality Research Consortium. Their report demonstrates the real value of our research communities and their potential to connect with stakeholders at scale. To date the GW4 Alliance’s Building Communities Programme has created 61 multi-disciplinary research communities and we look forward to sharing more of their pioneering work.”
GW4 Director, Dr Sarah Perkins, said: “Collaboration is at the heart of what we do at the GW4 Alliance, enabling our research communities to tackle critical health, societal and environmental challenges. These findings shed light on one of the most pressing inequality issues of our generation and will hopefully have a real impact in shaping government policy.”
This month the government published their response to a recent consultation on draft regulations likely to come into law. MPs still need to give their approval. Companies who took part in the research said they were actively making preparations. Among the most popular measures HR managers are putting into place to meet the demands of the reporting requirements are that they will be proactively undertaking their own pay gap analysis and auditing their data to ensure that they will meet the regulatory requirements.